Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria.
信件給編輯：像 ChatGPT 這樣的 NLP 系統無法被列為作者，因為這些系統無法符合廣泛採用的作者資格標準。
Account Res 2024-02-16
Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article?
An artificial intelligence chatbot can be listed as an author of a scholarly article, but it is important to note that the responsibility for the content and accuracy of the article ultimately lies with the human creators and developers of the AI chatbot. In academic publishing, authorship typically implies intellectual contribution to the research, analysis, and writing of the article, which may not align with the capabilities of current AI technology. As AI continues to advance, ethical considerations around AI authorship and intellectual contribution are likely to evolve.
J Educ Eval Health Prof 2023-12-14
ChatGPT in action: Harnessing artificial intelligence potential and addressing ethical challenges in medicine, education, and scientific research.
ChatGPT 實踐中：發揮人工智慧潛力並應對醫學、教育和科學研究中的道德挑戰。
World J Methodol 2023-10-03
Transparency in research: An analysis of ChatGPT usage acknowledgment by authors across disciplines and geographies.
研究透明度：跨學科和地理範圍內作者對 ChatGPT 使用致謝的分析。
Account Res 2023-11-09
研究分析了在Dimensions數據庫中1,226篇文章，發現ChatGPT等AI工具在學術文獻中廣泛應用。美國作者表現優異，中國和印度也有貢獻。生醫、臨床科學和資訊計算是主要應用領域。"The Lancet Digital Health"和"bioRxiv"是常見致謝地點，顯示AI對研究有重要影響。研究聚焦在Dimensions，未考慮其他來源，也未評估致謝品質或道德。結果提供學術界有關AI使用的道德信息，是對AI致謝模式的首次全面分析，揭示未曾探索的學術交流面向。
PubMedDOI
ChatGPT as an "author": Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship.
ChatGPT作為「作者」：進行文獻計量分析以評估作者身份的有效性。
Account Res 2024-05-02