Validity of the large language model ChatGPT (GPT4) as a patient information source in otolaryngology by a variety of doctors in a tertiary otorhinolaryngology department.
大型語言模型ChatGPT（GPT4）在耳鼻喉科作為病人資訊來源的有效性：由三級耳鼻喉科部門的多位醫生進行評估。
Acta Otolaryngol 2023-11-09
Are artificial intelligence large language models a reliable tool for difficult differential diagnosis? An a posteriori analysis of a peculiar case of necrotizing otitis externa.
人工智慧大型語言模型在困難的鑑別診斷中是可靠的工具嗎？對壞死性外耳炎特殊案例的事後分析。
Clin Case Rep 2023-09-23
Is artificial intelligence ready to replace specialist doctors entirely? ENT specialists vs ChatGPT: 1-0, ball at the center.
人工智慧是否已經準備完全取代專科醫生？耳鼻喉科專家 vs ChatGPT：1-0，球在中場。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024-03-01
Performance and Consistency of ChatGPT-4 Versus Otolaryngologists: A Clinical Case Series.
ChatGPT-4 與耳鼻喉科醫師的表現和一致性：臨床案例系列。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024-04-09
Can Artificial Intelligence Mitigate Missed Diagnoses by Generating Differential Diagnoses for Neurosurgeons?
人工智慧是否能透過為神經外科醫師生成不同診斷來減輕漏診情況？
World Neurosurg 2024-05-17
Feasibility of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Using GPT-4 Vision for the Classification of Middle Ear Disease: Qualitative Study and Validation.
使用 GPT-4 Vision 多模式人工智慧進行中耳疾病分類的可行性：定性研究與驗證。
JMIR AI 2024-06-14
Advancing Medical Education: Performance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models on Otolaryngology Board Preparation Questions With Image Analysis Insights.
推進醫學教育：生成式人工智慧模型在耳鼻喉科考試準備問題上的表現及影像分析見解。
Cureus 2024-08-12
這項研究評估了三個人工智慧模型—ChatGPT、GPT-4 和 Google Bard—在美國耳鼻喉科考試問題上的表現，分析了1,077道文字題和60道圖片題。結果顯示，GPT-4的表現最佳，得分78.7%，而ChatGPT和Bard分別為55.3%和61.7%（p<0.001）。所有模型在簡單問題上表現較好，GPT-4在各子專科得分也較高，僅過敏科差異不顯著。雖然GPT-4表現良好，但在醫學教育和病人護理中的應用仍需謹慎。
PubMedDOI